View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
civilian
Joined: 17 May 2008 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 2:35 am Post subject: Range of attackable levels |
|
|
Hello
I think it would be more incouraging for newbies to have a percentual range of levels one can attack. I mean instead of +/- 5 to the own level i would prefer +/- 10% of the own level. That means that newbies can no longer be attacked by players up to level 6, but a level 60 player can attack players within a range of 12 levels (from 54 to 66). This would also reduce farming a bit. IMO this sounds fair.
Or has anybody ever seen a level one player fighting a level two player? |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/race_conflicts/images/spacer.gif) |
j0hn_c3na Forum Admin
Joined: 19 Jun 2005 Posts: 384 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 4:38 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
I could beat the crap out of anybody in my level range if I wanted to ![Laughing](images/smiles/icon_lol.gif) |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/race_conflicts/images/spacer.gif) |
civilian
Joined: 17 May 2008 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I found a flaw in my suggestion (high levels can attack lower levels without the possibility of a counterattack from the low level player), which i would correct like that:
The possibility of an attack should be an attribute of the deffender/every player. e. g. [EDIT] Everybody should be able to attack everybody with just one rule constraining this: Each player let's say of [/EDIT] level 'a' may be attacked by levels up to (a x 1.1), and no other setting about this.
Last edited by civilian on Thu May 29, 2008 1:04 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/race_conflicts/images/spacer.gif) |
j0hn_c3na Forum Admin
Joined: 19 Jun 2005 Posts: 384 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 12:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
"high levels can attack lower levels without the possibility of a counterattack from the low level player"
This would be stupid... The low level player is supposedly the weakest, hence why low levelled players should be able to attack high levelled ones and not the other way around. However, I think the current system is fine:
You can attack up to a difference of 7 levels, if you're smart you'll remain at level 7. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/race_conflicts/images/spacer.gif) |
civilian
Joined: 17 May 2008 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
E. g. a level 3 player with an army with a strong offensive value but weak defensive is attacked by a level 4 player with a similar army. The level 3 player may want to take revenge.
But this is not my point. My point is to reduce the possibility to attack low level players by a certain degree and at the same time to reduce farming a little bit. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/race_conflicts/images/spacer.gif) |
j0hn_c3na Forum Admin
Joined: 19 Jun 2005 Posts: 384 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why?
It's an attacking game, not a build your defense and never attack anybody game.
The level 4 attacks on his own peril knowing that he might be attacked by whoever he is attacking. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/race_conflicts/images/spacer.gif) |
|