FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
 
 
Easter Tourney 2013
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    raceconflicts.com Forum Index -> Tavern
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bashar
Forum Admin


Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 1442
Location: Bucharest

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:12 pm    Post subject: Easter Tourney 2013 Reply with quote

Prize pool: 100B
Attendance: levels 30+
Type: Defence(the player who has less defeats wins)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
dragonsq



Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Posts: 153

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Omg I Love you. For a suggestion if there is a tie in defeats attack/win percentage should decide who goes ahead.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bashar
Forum Admin


Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 1442
Location: Bucharest

PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

level
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
dragonsq



Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Posts: 153

PostPosted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

well it seems like ive got to a good start Twisted Evil now its my turn to go into defence mode Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
inamicul



Joined: 16 Apr 2005
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just satisfy my curiosity: if it's based on deff then who will attack ?
_________________
at lv 1 knight , at 14 baron. What`s next?
(pro camper)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bashar
Forum Admin


Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 1442
Location: Bucharest

PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dragonsq to assure himself all of us have some defeats and he to win this.

I am curently just watching how things goes before i make my move.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
j0hn_c3na
Forum Admin


Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 384
Location: Portugal

PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I noticed that the Win/Lose ratio percentages are starting at 0%.

Being this a defense tourney, shouldn't they be at 100% for everyone and then start dropping when defeats happen?
_________________
Forum Admin

Problem With My Modding? PM Me Or bashar
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dragonsq



Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Posts: 153

PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 7:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nah win/lose ratio should be at 0% because attack/defence. With 0 wins and 0 loses its the same thing as 0/0 which= 0 And bashar my defence is currently at 328million but i can make it go way higher by selling some of my spies and senitals then making sure my fatigues at 100 not something low like -50 Wink i think ive got this in the bag as long as no1 tries to make a sneak attack like i did Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bashar
Forum Admin


Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 1442
Location: Bucharest

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We can all allie against you and maybe something nice will get out of this Twisted Evil


Quote:
I noticed that the Win/Lose ratio percentages are starting at 0%.

Being this a defense tourney, shouldn't they be at 100% for everyone and then start dropping when defeats happen?


It is becouse the formula is 0 divided by something when you have 0 victories.
And 0 divided by anything equals o. even though 0/0 = 0 is mathematically incorect, mysql says it equals 0 and is fine by me Smile

Becouse win/lose ratio is not important i could just put it out entirely, but it is there for informational purposes.

This also helps in attack/defence ratio couse being 0% from the start it makes the player attack at least once or else he will have 0% always.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
j0hn_c3na
Forum Admin


Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 384
Location: Portugal

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 4:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bashar wrote:
This also helps in attack/defence ratio couse being 0% from the start it makes the player attack at least once or else he will have 0% always.


That would make sense in an offensive tourney such as Win / Lose Ratio. But this is Defense. It's more than recommended that you don't use the same formula. Otherwise, you're going against the point of this being a Defense tourney.

With that said, if you maintain your opinion that a player should attack in a Defense tourney, that means that campers will be forced to level up in order to participate.
And in my case, my participation in this will be zero.
_________________
Forum Admin

Problem With My Modding? PM Me Or bashar
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dragonsq



Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Posts: 153

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

@j0hn C3na your win/lose % doesn't mean anything its the amount of defeats you have.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bashar
Forum Admin


Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 1442
Location: Bucharest

PostPosted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 9:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
With that said, if you maintain your opinion that a player should attack in a Defense tourney, that means that campers will be forced to level up in order to participate.


I am not saying someone should attack, i wanted to say just i am using the same formula and scripts couse it is easier to code that way for both offence and defence and the only difference is in the end when the winner is decided.

If it shows 0% or 100% when no battles were fought is just a flavor and is open for debate.

In my opinion this should always be 0% becouse is like saying a general had only victories or that he is undefeated but he fought in no battle.
It is like comparing Alexander the Great who had 100% ratio in battles with other general who had no battles and so he is also undefeated in battle with 100% ratio.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
j0hn_c3na
Forum Admin


Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 384
Location: Portugal

PostPosted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, the actual criteria for the decision of the winner has nothing to do with Win / Lose%.

I'm OK with that. Thanks for clearing it out.

Btw, check your PMs please.
_________________
Forum Admin

Problem With My Modding? PM Me Or bashar
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dragonsq



Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Posts: 153

PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a feeling Zedus is gonna try and make a sneak attack soon ;(
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bashar
Forum Admin


Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 1442
Location: Bucharest

PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hope he hurries Twisted Evil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    raceconflicts.com Forum Index -> Tavern All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group